Survival Rate of Cows Undergoing Caesarean Section in Field Conditions: A Retrospective Study

Sagar Sahoo *

Fisheries and Animal Resources Development Department, Govt. of Odisha, Veterinary Dispensary, Begunia, Khordha, Odisha – 752062, India

Biswadeep Jena

Department of Veterinary Surgery & Radiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha – 751001, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Background: Bovine caesarean section is used to manage dystocia when assisted vaginal delivery is not feasible.

Aim: The present retrospective study was conducted to determine the survival rate of cows with dystocia that underwent caesarean section.

Materials & Methods: In toto, forty-eight cows were included in the study, and all were presented to the Veterinary Dispensary, Begunia, Dist. – Khordha, Odisha. The cows were categorised into three groups based on the interval between diagnosis and presentation of the dystocia case to the dispensary. Cases in Group – I (Elective group, n = 14) were presented within 12 hours; those in Group – II (Emergency group, n = 18) were presented between 12 and 36 hours; and those in Group – III (Emphysematous group, n = 16) were presented beyond 36 hours. Follow-up was performed until the removal of external sutures on the 14th post-operative day.

Results: The dam survival rates for the three groups were evaluated and found to be 100%, 89%, and 25% for Groups I, II, and III, respectively.

Conclusion: Client education is required to facilitate timely decisions to present cases for caesarean section to a veterinary dispensary/hospital, which can save the lives of both dam and calf.

Keywords: Bovine caesarean section, dystocia, dam survival, parturition-to-surgery interval, field conditions, primiparity, foetal viability, emphysematous foetus, postoperative survival, obstetric surgery


How to Cite

Sahoo, Sagar, and Biswadeep Jena. 2026. “Survival Rate of Cows Undergoing Caesarean Section in Field Conditions: A Retrospective Study”. Archives of Current Research International 26 (9):171-78. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2026/v26i92120.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.