Operational Determinants of Communication Delay for Critical Complete-Blood-Count Values: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Analysis Decomposing Turnaround Time into Analytical and Post-Analytical Phases

Francisco Kauê Carvalho Aguiar *

Centro Universitário Inta – UNINTA, Sobral, Brazil.

Ivina Rhaysse Ximenes Mesquita

Centro Universitário Inta – UNINTA, Sobral, Brazil.

João Roberval Lopes Alves Júnior

Centro Universitário Inta – UNINTA, Sobral, Brazil.

Deivide de Sousa Oliveira

Centro Universitário Inta – UNINTA, Sobral, Brazil.

Alaíde Maria Rodrigues Pinheiro

Centro Universitário Inta – UNINTA, Sobral, Brazil.

José Jackson do Nascimento Costa

Centro Universitário Inta – UNINTA, Sobral, Brazil.

Ana Kélvia Araújo Arcanjo

Centro Universitário Inta – UNINTA, Sobral, Brazil.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Background: Timely communication of critical complete blood count (CBC) results is an important quality indicator in laboratory medicine. However, factors associated with prolonged turnaround time (TAT) remain insufficiently characterised in tertiary-care settings.

Objective: To quantify total, analytical, and post-analytical TAT for critical CBC results communicated through a hospital alert system and to identify predictors of communication delay.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated 544 CBCs with critical results recorded between January and June 2025 at a tertiary hospital in Brazil. Institutional critical-value thresholds included haemoglobin <6.0 or >18.0 g/dL, leukocyte counts <2.0 or >30.0 × 10⁹/L, platelet counts <50 or >1,000 × 10⁹/L, and the presence of circulating blasts. TAT was divided into analytical and post-analytical phases using timestamps for sample collection, technical release, and notification. Communication-time analyses included 487 records with available timestamps. Outcomes included TAT ≥2 h and ≥4 h and continuous log-transformed TAT.

Results: Median total TAT was 5.45 h (IQR 3.12–13.18), predominantly reflecting the analytical phase (median 3.86 h), while post-analytical notification time was shorter (median 0.62 h). Overall, 8.0% of cases had a total TAT ≤2 h and 37.0% had a total TAT ≤4 h. Inpatient ward origin was independently associated with TAT ≥4 h (OR 4.22, 95% CI 2.65–6.71). Leukocytosis and weekend collection were also associated with prolonged TAT.

Conclusions: Prolonged TAT for critical CBC results was associated primarily with operational and workflow-related factors. The analytical phase accounted for the largest proportion of total TAT, suggesting that inpatient sample logistics and weekend laboratory workflows may represent important targets for quality improvement.

Keywords: Critical values, complete blood count, turnaround time, laboratory medicine, patient safety, analytical phase, post-analytical phase, critical-result notification, laboratory workflow, quality indicators


How to Cite

Aguiar, Francisco Kauê Carvalho, Ivina Rhaysse Ximenes Mesquita, João Roberval Lopes Alves Júnior, Deivide de Sousa Oliveira, Alaíde Maria Rodrigues Pinheiro, José Jackson do Nascimento Costa, and Ana Kélvia Araújo Arcanjo. 2026. “Operational Determinants of Communication Delay for Critical Complete-Blood-Count Values: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Analysis Decomposing Turnaround Time into Analytical and Post-Analytical Phases”. Archives of Current Research International 26 (10):492-501. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2026/v26i102228.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.